This is the back up forum for pregnancyforum.org.uk
This is the back up forum for our main forum www.pregnancyforum.org.uk

We are working on the issues at the moment, you will need to REGISTER here if you haven't done already

Urchin :O)

hollyoaks.....argh!!!

View previous topic View next topic Go down

hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by claire2711 on Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:57 am

omg iv just watched hollyoaks!! when is sasha gonna get her cumuppence!!!! Evil or Very Mad
avatar
claire2711

Female
Number of posts : 163
Age : 30
Location : eating
Registration date : 2008-07-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by fran_25 on Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:59 am

Sasha is such an idiot- she gets on my nerves! not as much as her stepmum though!! lol

i feel so sorr for Tina bless!
avatar
fran_25

Female
Number of posts : 77
Age : 34
Registration date : 2008-07-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by Gem & Leland on Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:36 pm

at the mo the baby story line is getting me , that was ment to be a 30 week prem baby ,anyone with a 30 weeker knows u got weeks in neonatel before you can go home ! but thats gone home looking like its 2 months old already Sad feel for all the people out there that have had very sick 30 weekers it must be driving them mad
avatar
Gem & Leland

Female
Number of posts : 60
Age : 35
Registration date : 2008-07-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by LisaJ1986 on Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:57 pm

I said that to my OH. My nephew was born at 28 weeks, he looked nothing like that at 30 weeks! That baby on there is kicking it's legs like Angel has not long been doing! God forbid if she went full term with a baby that big at 30 weeks!
avatar
LisaJ1986

Female
Number of posts : 59
Age : 30
Registration date : 2008-07-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by lfc_sarah on Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:10 pm

LisaJ1986 wrote:I said that to my OH. My nephew was born at 28 weeks, he looked nothing like that at 30 weeks! That baby on there is kicking it's legs like Angel has not long been doing! God forbid if she went full term with a baby that big at 30 weeks!

Yeah but it will be hard for tv people to find a baby thats as small as a prem baby put up for tv work

Rediculous that the baby can go home straight away though
Callum was born at 37 weeks and still had to stay in Mad
avatar
lfc_sarah

Female
Number of posts : 88
Age : 29
Location : Ripon
Registration date : 2008-07-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by LisaJ1986 on Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:14 pm

They should disguise it a bit more. I've seen smaller babies on programs. That 1 is just huge. But like it's been said, it was allowed home after a few days. That story is just making me mad anyway, the whole giving it up, selfish story.
avatar
LisaJ1986

Female
Number of posts : 59
Age : 30
Registration date : 2008-07-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by welshpolly on Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:49 pm

I was shocked at the size of baby Max too.
You'd have thought they would have researched it better!
avatar
welshpolly

Female
Number of posts : 11
Age : 41
Location : Merseyside
Registration date : 2008-07-08

View user profile http://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/1ec46d

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by Gem & Leland on Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:53 pm

im sorry a baby at 30 weeks would barely be moving anyway so they coulda used a life like doll !!! even leland , being a huge weight at 34 weeks was in 4 days lol
avatar
Gem & Leland

Female
Number of posts : 60
Age : 35
Registration date : 2008-07-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by jennywren on Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:25 pm

Yeah it is a bit worng, I think the point is going to be though that the baby is Russ's so she was actually alot further on than they thought (so the insimination with tony didnt work as she was already pregnant but didnt know) so perhaps thats one reason why there doing it?/

They shuld have been much more sensitive to the issue though, same in all these progs really!

jennywren

Female
Number of posts : 10
Age : 37
Registration date : 2008-07-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by Gem & Leland on Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:30 am

no , its the 30 weeks is the further date ! if u saw it tony said oh no his younger then that when nurse said how well he was for 30 weeks ! that makes it even worse lol
avatar
Gem & Leland

Female
Number of posts : 60
Age : 35
Registration date : 2008-07-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by steelgoddess on Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 am

I agree, that baby looks like a six mth old baby!!!

The stroylines are being played out a bit logn imho they need to get a wiggle on, its getting silly now!!!! Sleep
avatar
steelgoddess

Female
Number of posts : 21
Age : 37
Location : At home chillng...
Registration date : 2008-07-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: hollyoaks.....argh!!!

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum